From: Kennedy, BW (Bruce) [bruce.kennedy@stfc.ac.uk] Sent: 20 February 2009 18:00 To: Dave Cockerill Subject: RE: Endcap perf and stability mtg today Attachments: crpos.out Dave, Here is an improved version of the file I sent yesterday. I have sorted out out a couple of minor bugs, added some new columns of data, and tidied up the formatting. The file looks like this... SCc SCr CRc CRr CRx CRy X Y Z Pol Azim 1 3 1 1 1 11 15.916 321.770 3417.451 0.066 1.618 1 3 1 2 1 12 15.916 352.215 3415.617 0.072 1.614 1 3 1 3 1 13 15.916 382.663 3413.774 0.079 1.611 1 3 1 4 1 14 15.916 413.113 3411.922 0.085 1.608 1 3 1 5 1 15 15.916 443.567 3410.062 0.091 1.605 1 3 2 1 2 11 45.035 321.775 3417.532 0.067 1.713 1 3 2 2 2 12 45.036 352.220 3415.698 0.073 1.701 1 3 2 3 2 13 45.036 382.668 3413.855 0.079 1.690 etc Where SCc, SCr are the supercrystal column and row within the quadrant, CRc, CRr and the crystal column and row within the supercrystal, CRx, CRy are the crystal X and Y coordinates within the quadrant, (X,Y,Z) is the position of the centre of the rear face of the crystal, Pol,Azim are the polar and azimuthal angles of the crystal (and therefore VPT) axis. If you need anything else added please let me know. Also, I can easily change the format of the file if required. Bruce -- ============================================ Bruce Kennedy Particle Physics Department, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Phone: (0)1235 445075 Email: Bruce.Kennedy@stfc.ac.uk Mobile: (0)7940 857437 > -----Original Message----- > From: Kennedy, BW (Bruce) > Sent: 19 February 2009 16:13 > To: Dave Cockerill > Subject: RE: Endcap perf and stability mtg today > > Dave, > > Apologies for absence - it's half-term here, and I'm unexpectedly > stuck at home because of an unavoidable chenge of plans concerning > childcare. Brief report: > > a) Crystal positions - nearly done. I attach a data file for > comments. The columns are > > SC column, SC row, CR column, CR row, (x,y,z) of centre of crystal > rear face > > I'm aware of one bug (the (4,4) crystal does not seem to have been > printed, and I need to do some more checking of the figures, but > things look sensible. > > b) Test beam simulation. I've had a quick look through > Brian's simulation code, which is more developed than the geometry I > had produced, so it would seem sensible to adapt that to our needs > instead. I'll be working on this from now on. > > c) RAL/Virginia VPT measurements - will restart this when > the I've debugged the crystal position calculation. > > Bruce > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dave Cockerill [mailto:Dave.Cockerill@cern.ch] > Sent: Thu 19/02/2009 11:05 > To: cms-ee-vpts-and-analysis; hn-cms-ecalperformance > Cc: rusack@physics.umn.edu > Subject: Endcap perf and stability mtg today > > > Endcap performance and stability mtg today > > Thurs Feb 19 at 17.00 > in 20-01-004 at CERN > > EVO booked, Universe, EE perf and Stab EVO phone bridge 805553 > > Agenda > > 17:00 Round table - EE hardware activities at CERN (30') > > 17:30 H4 Monte carlo, VPT angles, UVa tube data at 3.8T (15') Bruce > Kennedy > > 17:45 Reminder of H4 test beam details (20') Sasha Ledovskoy > > 18:05 Comments on H4 Dee4 analyses (20') Dan Andelin > > 18:25 H4 data analyis (20') Dae Jung Kong > > 18:45 Comments on Dan Andelin H4 fits (20') ( Slides ) Bob Brown > > 19:05 Discussion on the 'Pre Ageing' of VPTs (20') > > 19:25 A.O.B. (10') > > Dave and Shasha > > > > -- Scanned by iCritical.